← Matchups

Arizona State

B12 · 1-1 · power +14.0 · #60
Our side · spreadASU +14.5 logged our number at the pick TA&M -12.2 · now TA&M -19.3 · 4.8 pts from the market now

Texas A&M

SEC · 2-0 · power +31.6 · #5
Final ASU 20 · TA&M 48 ML W Spread L Total L our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadASU +14.5 logged live now: TA&M -14.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours TA&M -19.3

The line has not moved a point since it opened (TA&M -14 → -14.5), so our number decides: TA&M by 12.2 against TA&M -14.5 means ASU covers.

TotalUnder 50.5 logged live now: Over 50.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours 60.0

The market's move decides. The total opened 51.5 and is now 50.5, toward the under; that side has covered 55.1% at the opener since 2021. Ours at the pick: 51.7 — the other side, overruled.

MoneylineTA&M to win logged ours 86% · book 85%

Our number: TA&M by 12.2 — TA&M to win.

TA&M team totalTA&M under 31.5 logged live now: TA&M under 33.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours 39.6

Follows the spread and total picks: if TA&M by 12.2 and the game stays under 50.5, TA&M scores at most 31.4.

no pick

No ASU team-total pick: the spread and total picks put ASU under 19.1, which does not decide 17.5.

Distance from the market 4.8 pts / +9.5 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 20–40 ASU – TA&M
2026-09-12 · 12:00 PM Kyle Field · College Station, TX Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book ASU spreadTA&M spread OverUnder ASU winTA&M win ASU TT overASU TT under TA&M TT overTA&M TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadTexas A&M -19.3
the marketTexas A&M -14.5
Total60.0
the market50.5
Texas A&M win86% vs 85%

Both percentages are Texas A&M’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread TA&M 64% bets · 48% money · money ASU total Under 52% bets · 38% money · money Over ML TA&M 97% bets · 93% money
Series Texas A&M lead 1–0 · 1 meeting since 2015
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Arizona State Sun Devils 81 ranks
Arizona State Sun Devils #96 rush offense Texas A&M Aggies #177 run defense
Pass game edge Texas A&M Aggies 120 ranks
Arizona State Sun Devils #134 pass offense Texas A&M Aggies #14 pass defense
Run game even 9 ranks apart
Texas A&M Aggies #67 rush offense Arizona State Sun Devils #76 run defense
Pass game even 27 ranks apart
Texas A&M Aggies #55 pass offense Arizona State Sun Devils #82 pass defense
Arizona State Sun Devils Balanced · 55% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 44 rush ypg Texas A&M Aggies Balanced · 55% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 39 rush ypg
Kenny Dillingham · 22-17 · defense-minded Mike Elko · 35-16

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Arizona State Sun Devils
WR Reed Harris 15 rec · 326 yds · 4 TD #4 WR
QB Cutter Boley 641 pass yds · 8 TD · 2 INT #22 QB
WR Omarion Miller 17 rec · 131 yds · 1 TD #86 WR
DB Montana Warren 10 tkl #343 DB
Texas A&M Aggies
DL Marco Jones 5 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL #10 DL
DB Julio Humphrey 2 tkl · 1 PD · 1 INT #84 DB
WR Isaiah Horton 7 rec · 109 yds · 3 TD #82 WR
DL T.J. Searcy 8 tkl · 1.5 TFL #166 DL

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Arizona State Sun DevilsB12 +14.0 +10.4 +3.6 #60
Texas A&M AggiesSEC +31.6 +16.2 +15.4 #5

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Arizona State offense vs Texas A&M defense-5.0 pts
Texas A&M offense vs Arizona State defense+12.6 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 933 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.