← Matchups

Chattanooga

· 1-2 · power -8.8 · #281
Our numberALA -49.0 no book has priced this game

Alabama

SEC · 2-0 (1-0 SEC) · power +33.7 · #4
Our side
MoneylineALA to win ours 99%
Projected score 3–52 UTC – ALA
2026-11-21 · 2:00 PM Bryant-Denny Stadium · Tuscaloosa, AL Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

Series Alabama lead 14–0 · 14 meetings since 1908
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game even 30 ranks apart
Chattanooga Mocs #127 rush offense Alabama Crimson Tide #97 run defense
Pass game edge Alabama Crimson Tide 194 ranks
Chattanooga Mocs #223 pass offense Alabama Crimson Tide #29 pass defense
Run game edge Chattanooga Mocs 67 ranks
Alabama Crimson Tide #213 rush offense Chattanooga Mocs #146 run defense
Pass game edge Alabama Crimson Tide 166 ranks
Alabama Crimson Tide #49 pass offense Chattanooga Mocs #215 pass defense
Chattanooga Mocs Run-heavy · 60% run Ball-control Dual-threat QB · 43 rush ypg Alabama Crimson Tide Balanced · 48% run Ball-control
Kalen DeBoer · 57-17

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Chattanooga Mocs
DB Keyshawn Jackson 18 tkl · 5 PD #69 DB
RB Kevin Lalin 290 rush yds · 2 TD · 5 rec #51 RB
LB Zion Rutledge 24 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL #115 LB
DB Kam Baah-Slay 12 tkl · 2 PD #230 DB
Alabama Crimson Tide
K Conor Talty 5 FG · 10 XP · 25 pts #2 K
LB Yhonzae Pierre 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL #30 LB
LB Luke Metz 10 tkl #35 LB
RB Daniel Hill 151 rush yds · 3 TD · 4 rec #29 RB

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Chattanooga Mocs -8.8 -7.8 -1.0 #281
Alabama Crimson TideSEC +33.7 +18.9 +14.9 #4

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Chattanooga offense vs Alabama defense-22.6 pts
Alabama offense vs Chattanooga defense+19.9 pts

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.