FinalBC 15 · CIN 34ML WSpread WTotal Wour logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
MoneylineCIN to winloggedours 78%
Our number: CIN by 10.5 — CIN to win.
BC team totalBC under 21.5loggedours 20.7
Our number: BC 19.2, from our margin and total split into two scores.
CIN team totalCIN under 30.5loggedours 34.8
Our number: CIN 29.7, from our margin and total split into two scores.
Projected score21–35BC – CIN
2026-09-05 · 3:30 PMNippert Stadium · Cincinnati, OHEarly season
The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book
Book
BC spread
CIN spread
Over
Under
BC win
CIN win
BC TT over
BC TT under
CIN TT over
CIN TT under
DraftKings
—
—
—
—
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars
The gold price is the best available on that side;
a gold ★ marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick.
TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s;
columns are empty where no book hangs one.
Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked.
Prices are the books’ own.
Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Networkcaptured in-gamespreadCIN 59% bets · 32% money · money BCtotalUnder 84% bets · 83% moneyMLCIN 96% bets · 73% money
Series
Boston College and Cincinnati split 8 (4–4)
· 8 meetings since 1961
2025 unit ranks —
last completed season, from games actually played
Run gameeven10 ranks apart
Boston College Eagles #175 rush offenseCincinnati Bearcats #185 run defense
Pass gameeven12 ranks apart
Boston College Eagles #140 pass offenseCincinnati Bearcats #152 pass defense
Run gameedge Cincinnati Bearcats129 ranks
Cincinnati Bearcats #27 rush offenseBoston College Eagles #156 run defense
Pass gameedge Cincinnati Bearcats159 ranks
Cincinnati Bearcats #37 pass offenseBoston College Eagles #196 pass defense
Boston College EaglesBalanced · 45% runAvg paceCincinnati BearcatsBalanced · 53% runBall-controlDual-threat QB · 48 rush ypg
Bill O'Brien · 9-16Scott Satterfield · 80-57 · offense-minded
Ranked by team-unit strength
(rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265
D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the
2025 season.
The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above
Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their
position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no
2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for
these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.
Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).
Where the number comes from
Boston College offense vs Cincinnati defense-6.7 pts
Cincinnati offense vs Boston College defense+5.6 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 732 mi
An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have
played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.
Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest
were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them.
Adding them again would double-count.