← Matchups

UT Martin

· 1-2 · power -8.1 · #278
Our side · spreadWVU -39.5 logged our number at the pick WVU -2.9 · now WVU -28.7 · 12.8 pts from the market now

West Virginia

B12 · 2-0 · power +10.1 · #84
Final UTM 7 · WVU 52 ML W Spread W Total L our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadWVU -39.5 logged live now: UTM +41.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours WVU -28.7

Guarantee game: the roster layer's per-game call from both rosters (returning production, portal moves, depth) puts the favorite +2.94 against the line, past its 2-point trigger. It outranks the market's move here.

TotalUnder 56.5 logged ours 54.3

The total has not moved a point since it opened (55.5 → 56.5); ours 52.7 against 56.5 says under.

MoneylineWVU to win logged ours 95% · book 99%

Our number: WVU by 27.4 — WVU to win.

Distance from the market 12.8 pts / -2.2 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 13–42 UTM – WVU
2026-09-12 · 1:00 PM Milan Puskar Stadium · Morgantown, WV Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book UTM spreadWVU spread OverUnder UTM winWVU win UTM TT overUTM TT under WVU TT overWVU TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadWest Virginia -28.7
the marketWest Virginia -41.5
Total54.3
the market56.5
West Virginia win95% vs 99%

Both percentages are West Virginia’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread UTM 88% bets · 57% money total Over 53% bets · 56% money
First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge West Virginia Mountaineers 144 ranks
UT Martin Skyhawks #199 rush offense West Virginia Mountaineers #55 run defense
Pass game edge UT Martin Skyhawks 81 ranks
UT Martin Skyhawks #108 pass offense West Virginia Mountaineers #189 pass defense
Run game edge UT Martin Skyhawks 168 ranks
West Virginia Mountaineers #253 rush offense UT Martin Skyhawks #85 run defense
Pass game edge West Virginia Mountaineers 59 ranks
West Virginia Mountaineers #189 pass offense UT Martin Skyhawks #248 pass defense
UT Martin Skyhawks Run-heavy · 63% run Ball-control Dual-threat QB · 38 rush ypg West Virginia Mountaineers Run-heavy · 62% run Ball-control
Rich Rodriguez · 39-38 · defense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
UT Martin Skyhawks
P Max Zuluaga 8 punts · 51.4 yd avg #1 P
DB Trey Cotton 23 tkl · 1 INT #12 DB
DL Chris Wilson 14 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL #78 DL
DB Jamal Mayers 12 tkl · 3 PD #73 DB
West Virginia Mountaineers
RB Cam Cook 194 rush yds · 3 TD · 2 rec #38 RB
QB Michael Hawkins Jr. 287 pass yds · 3 TD · 0 INT #21 QB
LB Isaiah Patterson 14 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL #193 LB
WR DJ Epps 5 rec · 148 yds · 1 TD #211 WR

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
UT Martin Skyhawks -8.1 -6.7 -1.4 #278
West Virginia MountaineersB12 +10.1 +6.0 +4.0 #84

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
UT Martin offense vs West Virginia defense-10.8 pts
West Virginia offense vs UT Martin defense+7.4 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 536 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.