← Matchups

Arizona

B12 · 1-1 (0-1 B12) · power +22.9 · #22
Our side · spreadARIZ +7.5 logged our number at the pick BYU -6.8 · now BYU -4.0 · 3.0 pts from the market now

BYU

B12 · 2-0 (1-0 B12) · power +25.1 · #16
Final ARIZ 17 · BYU 28 ML W Spread L Total W our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadARIZ +7.5 logged live now: ARIZ +7 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours BYU -4.0

The line has not moved a point since it opened (BYU -7.5 → -7.5), so our number decides: BYU by 6.8 against BYU -7.5 means ARIZ covers.

TotalUnder 48 logged live now: Over 48.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours 53.0

The market's move decides. The total opened 50.5 and is now 48, toward the under; that side has covered 55.1% at the opener since 2021. Ours at the pick: 50.4 — the other side, overruled.

MoneylineBYU to win logged ours 59% · book 70%

Our number: BYU by 6.8 — BYU to win.

no pick

No ARIZ team-total pick: the spread and total picks put ARIZ under 20.6, which does not decide 20.5.

Distance from the market 3.0 pts / +4.5 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 24–28 ARIZ – BYU
2026-09-12 · 3:30 PM LaVell Edwards Stadium · Provo, UT B12 game Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book ARIZ spreadBYU spread OverUnder ARIZ winBYU win ARIZ TT overARIZ TT under BYU TT overBYU TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadBYU -4.0
the marketBYU -7.0
Total53.0
the market48.5
BYU win59% vs 70%

Both percentages are BYU’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread BYU 69% bets · 60% money total Over 65% bets · 57% money ML BYU 98% bets · 66% money
Series BYU lead 14–12–1 · 27 meetings since 1936
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game even 2 ranks apart
Arizona Wildcats #65 rush offense BYU Cougars #63 run defense
Pass game edge BYU Cougars 47 ranks
Arizona Wildcats #106 pass offense BYU Cougars #59 pass defense
Run game edge BYU Cougars 69 ranks
BYU Cougars #43 rush offense Arizona Wildcats #112 run defense
Pass game even 21 ranks apart
BYU Cougars #99 pass offense Arizona Wildcats #78 pass defense
Arizona Wildcats Balanced · 51% run Avg pace BYU Cougars Balanced · 57% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 41 rush ypg
Brent Brennan · 47-60 Kalani Sitake · 84-45

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Arizona Wildcats
QB Noah Fifita 492 pass yds · 3 TD · 1 INT #42 QB
WR Giovanni Richardson 13 rec · 144 yds #162 WR
LB Chase Kennedy 9 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 2.5 TFL #182 LB
RB Kedrick Reescano 97 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec #152 RB
BYU Cougars
QB Bear Bachmeier 415 pass yds · 6 TD · 0 INT #12 QB
DL Tausili Akana 4 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 2.5 TFL #171 DL
WR Legend Glasker 6 rec · 139 yds · 2 TD #113 WR
WR Kyler Kasper 8 rec · 93 yds · 2 TD #116 WR

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Arizona WildcatsB12 +22.9 +7.1 +15.8 #22
BYU CougarsB12 +25.1 +13.9 +11.2 #16

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Arizona offense vs BYU defense-4.0 pts
BYU offense vs Arizona defense-1.9 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 556 mi
Altitude · context only673 m higher than the visitor's home elevation

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.