← Matchups

Louisiana

SBC · 1-1 · power +10.2 · #81
Our side · spreadUL +30.5 logged our number at the pick USC -25.9 · now USC -17.6 · 12.9 pts from the market now

USC

B1G · 3-0 · power +26.1 · #14
Final UL 30 · USC 49 ML W Spread W Total L our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadUL +30.5 logged ours USC -17.6

The line has not moved a point since it opened (USC -30.5 → -30.5), so our number decides: USC by 25.9 against USC -30.5 means UL covers.

TotalUnder 59.5 logged live now: Over 58.5 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours 63.2

The total has not moved a point since it opened (60 → 59.5); ours 52.4 against 59.5 says under.

MoneylineUSC to win logged ours 84% · book 96%

Our number: USC by 25.9 — USC to win.

USC team totalUSC under 44.5 logged ours 40.4

Our number: USC 39.1, from our margin and total split into two scores.

Distance from the market 12.9 pts / +4.7 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 23–40 UL – USC
2026-09-12 · 11:00 PM Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum · Los Angeles, CA Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book UL spreadUSC spread OverUnder UL winUSC win UL TT overUL TT under USC TT overUSC TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadUSC -17.6
the marketUSC -30.5
Total63.2
the market58.5
USC win84% vs 96%

Both percentages are USC’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread USC 52% bets · 59% money total Under 82% bets · 68% money ML USC 99% bets · 83% money
First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 76 ranks
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns #81 rush offense USC Trojans #157 run defense
Pass game edge USC Trojans 128 ranks
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns #213 pass offense USC Trojans #85 pass defense
Run game edge USC Trojans 180 ranks
USC Trojans #50 rush offense Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns #230 run defense
Pass game edge USC Trojans 142 ranks
USC Trojans #9 pass offense Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns #151 pass defense
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Run-heavy · 62% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 57 rush ypg USC Trojans Balanced · 52% run Ball-control
Michael Desormeaux · 29-25 Lincoln Riley · 90-28 · offense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
DB Brent Gordon Jr. 11 tkl · 2 PD · 1 INT #72 DB
DB Avery Demery 8 tkl · 1 INT #188 DB
DB Collin Jacob 17 tkl #211 DB
TE Caden Jensen 5 rec · 77 yds #59 TE
USC Trojans
WR Trent Mosley 13 rec · 255 yds · 4 TD #13 WR
QB Jayden Maiava 896 pass yds · 10 TD · 1 INT #7 QB
TE Mark Bowman 12 rec · 128 yds · 2 TD #10 TE
P Lachlan Carrigan 3 punts · 46.7 yd avg #8 P

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Louisiana Ragin' CajunsSBC +10.2 +8.1 +2.1 #81
USC TrojansB1G +26.1 +16.9 +9.2 #14

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Louisiana offense vs USC defense-1.1 pts
USC offense vs Louisiana defense+14.8 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 1,554 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.