Our side
MoneylinePSU to win
ours 96%
Projected score
11–39
RUTG – PSU
2026-11-21 · kickoff TBD
Beaver Stadium · University Park, PA
B1G game
Early season
The books
No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.
Series
Penn State lead
33–2
· 35 meetings since 1918
2025 unit ranks —
last completed season, from games actually played
Run game
even
26 ranks apart
Rutgers Scarlet Knights #141 rush offense
Penn State Nittany Lions #115 run defense
Pass game
even
30 ranks apart
Rutgers Scarlet Knights #80 pass offense
Penn State Nittany Lions #50 pass defense
Run game
edge Penn State Nittany Lions
222 ranks
Penn State Nittany Lions #35 rush offense
Rutgers Scarlet Knights #257 run defense
Pass game
edge Penn State Nittany Lions
140 ranks
Penn State Nittany Lions #96 pass offense
Rutgers Scarlet Knights #236 pass defense
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Balanced · 50% run
Avg pace
Penn State Nittany Lions
Run-heavy · 59% run
Ball-control
Greg Schiano · 31-41 · offense-minded
Terry Smith · 4-3
Ranked by team-unit strength
(rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265
D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the
2025 season.
The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above
Who carried each team in 2025
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
WR
KJ Duff
17 rec · 333 yds · 5 TD
#1 WR
LB
Moses Walker
9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL
#129 LB
RB
Antwan Raymond
176 rush yds · 4 rec
#112 RB
DB
Jesse Ofurie
11 tkl · 1 PD
#538 DB
Penn State Nittany Lions
TE
Benjamin Brahmer
6 rec · 87 yds · 3 TD
#4 TE
LB
Tony Rojas
14 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL
#48 LB
WR
Koby Howard
9 rec · 229 yds · 1 TD
#71 WR
QB
Rocco Becht
539 pass yds · 7 TD · 0 INT
#30 QB
Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their
position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no
2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for
these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.
Power breakdown
Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).
Where the number comes from
Rutgers offense vs Penn State defense-14.9 pts
Penn State offense vs Rutgers defense+12.0 pts
Altitude · context only346 m higher than the visitor's home elevation
An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have
played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.
Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest
were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them.
Adding them again would double-count.