← Matchups

Navy

AAC · 1-1 (0-1 AAC) · power +9.1 · #91
Our numberUTSA -14.8 no book has priced this game

UTSA

AAC · 2-0 · power +19.0 · #42
Our side
MoneylineUTSA to win ours 77%
Projected score 20–35 NAVY – UTSA
2026-10-17 · kickoff TBD Alamodome · San Antonio, TX AAC game Indoors Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Navy Midshipmen 159 ranks
Navy Midshipmen #14 rush offense UTSA Roadrunners #173 run defense
Pass game edge Navy Midshipmen 174 ranks
Navy Midshipmen #35 pass offense UTSA Roadrunners #209 pass defense
Run game edge UTSA Roadrunners 89 ranks
UTSA Roadrunners #51 rush offense Navy Midshipmen #140 run defense
Pass game edge UTSA Roadrunners 144 ranks
UTSA Roadrunners #83 pass offense Navy Midshipmen #227 pass defense
Navy Midshipmen Run-heavy · 80% run Ball-control Dual-threat QB · 104 rush ypg UTSA Roadrunners Balanced · 46% run Ball-control
Brian Newberry · 26-12 · offense-minded Jeff Traylor · 53-26 · offense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Navy Midshipmen
DL Aiden Lyczek 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL #97 DL
LB MarcAnthony Parker 18 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #61 LB
DL Griffen Willis 6 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL #203 DL
TE Jordan Collins 2 rec · 68 yds · 1 TD #64 TE
UTSA Roadrunners
LB Brandon Tucker 18 tkl · 0.5 TFL #78 LB
DB Ahamad Chapman 3 tkl · 1 INT #177 DB
WR Mekhi Anderson 12 rec · 125 yds · 1 TD #144 WR
WR AJ Wilson 11 rec · 125 yds · 1 TD #155 WR

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Navy MidshipmenAAC +9.1 +4.6 +4.5 #91
UTSA RoadrunnersAAC +19.0 +11.8 +7.2 #42

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Navy offense vs UTSA defense-2.6 pts
UTSA offense vs Navy defense+7.4 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 1,414 mi

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.