← Matchups

Texas Southern

· 1-2 (0-1) · power -19.5 · #374
Our side · spreadTXSO +26.5 logged our number at the pick UTEP -24.8 · now UTEP -28.1 · 1.1 pts from the market now

UTEP

CUSA · 1-1 · power -2.1 · #199
Final TXSO 10 · UTEP 51 ML W Spread L Total W our logged sides, graded on the record
Our side
SpreadTXSO +26.5 logged live now: UTEP -27 — the pick stands, the number moved · ours UTEP -28.1

The line has not moved a point since it opened (UTEP -25.5 → -26.5), so our number decides: UTEP by 24.8 against UTEP -26.5 means TXSO covers.

TotalOver 53.5 logged ours 59.4

The total has not moved a point since it opened (53 → 53.5); ours 58.7 against 53.5 says over.

MoneylineUTEP to win logged ours 94% · book 94%

Our number: UTEP by 24.8 — UTEP to win.

Distance from the market 1.1 pts / +5.9 total a caution, not a signal
Projected score 16–44 TXSO – UTEP
2026-09-12 · 9:00 PM Sun Bowl · El Paso, TX Early season

The books 5 account books · tap any price — the ticket builds at that book

Book TXSO spreadUTEP spread OverUnder TXSO winUTEP win TXSO TT overTXSO TT under UTEP TT overUTEP TT under
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
ESPN Bet
Caesars

The gold price is the best available on that side; a gold marks the side our number implies — a read, not a pick. TT is a team total — that team’s own points, not the game’s; columns are empty where no book hangs one. Send to book opens whichever book you tapped, not the one we would have picked. Prices are the books’ own.

Ours vs the market

SpreadUTEP -28.1
the marketUTEP -27.0
Total59.4
the market53.5
UTEP win94% vs 94%

Both percentages are UTEP’s chance to win — ours, then the book’s with the vig removed, medianed across the books we track.

What the gap has been worth 10,740 games · 2016–2025

0–3 pts52.0%
3–750.2%
7–1449.3%
14+46.8%

How often the side we favoured covered, by how far our number sat from the market’s. Break-even at −110 is 52.4% — no bucket reaches it, and the rate falls as we disagree more. The further we sit from the market, the worse we have done.

Public vs booksbets vs money · Action Network captured in-game spread UTEP 53% bets · 50% money total Over 55% bets · 60% money ML UTEP 97% bets · 88% money
Series UTEP lead 3–0 · 3 meetings since 2001
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game even 38 ranks apart
Texas Southern Tigers #97 rush offense UTEP Miners #59 run defense
Pass game edge UTEP Miners 90 ranks
Texas Southern Tigers #204 pass offense UTEP Miners #114 pass defense
Run game edge Texas Southern Tigers 61 ranks
UTEP Miners #177 rush offense Texas Southern Tigers #116 run defense
Pass game edge Texas Southern Tigers 102 ranks
UTEP Miners #250 pass offense Texas Southern Tigers #148 pass defense
Texas Southern Tigers Run-heavy · 62% run Ball-control UTEP Miners Balanced · 50% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 44 rush ypg
Scotty Walden · 6-22 · defense-minded

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Texas Southern Tigers
LB Donovan Jones 22 tkl · 2.5 TFL #76 LB
DL Jordan Thompson 10 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #143 DL
RB Athean Renfro Jr. 293 rush yds · 2 TD · 3 rec #63 RB
DL Thurman Rayborn 5 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #176 DL
UTEP Miners
TE Cash Cheeks 3 rec · 51 yds · 2 TD #55 TE
QB EJ Colson Jr. 291 pass yds · 4 TD · 0 INT #73 QB
RB Tavorus Jones 128 rush yds · 1 TD · 4 rec #205 RB
DL Derek Burns 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #516 DL

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Texas Southern Tigers -19.5 -8.1 -11.5 #374
UTEP MinersCUSA -2.1 +0.4 -2.5 #199

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Texas Southern offense vs UTEP defense-5.6 pts
UTEP offense vs Texas Southern defense+11.9 pts
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 676 mi
Altitude · context only1,172 m higher than the visitor's home elevation

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.