← Matchups

UTEP

CUSA · 1-1 · power -2.1 · #199
Our numberUNM -16.7 no book has priced this game

New Mexico

MWC · 2-0 · power +12.1 · #73
Our side
MoneylineUNM to win ours 84%
Projected score 18–35 UTEP – UNM
2026-10-03 · kickoff TBD University Stadium (NM) · Albuquerque, NM Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

Series New Mexico lead 37–31–2 · 70 meetings since 1934
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge New Mexico Lobos 104 ranks
UTEP Miners #177 rush offense New Mexico Lobos #73 run defense
Pass game edge New Mexico Lobos 151 ranks
UTEP Miners #250 pass offense New Mexico Lobos #99 pass defense
Run game edge UTEP Miners 50 ranks
New Mexico Lobos #109 rush offense UTEP Miners #59 run defense
Pass game even 1 ranks apart
New Mexico Lobos #115 pass offense UTEP Miners #114 pass defense
UTEP Miners Balanced · 50% run Avg pace Dual-threat QB · 44 rush ypg New Mexico Lobos Balanced · 56% run Avg pace
Scotty Walden · 6-22 · defense-minded Jason Eck · 9-4

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
UTEP Miners
TE Cash Cheeks 3 rec · 51 yds · 2 TD #55 TE
QB EJ Colson Jr. 291 pass yds · 4 TD · 0 INT #73 QB
RB Tavorus Jones 128 rush yds · 1 TD · 4 rec #205 RB
DL Derek Burns 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL #516 DL
New Mexico Lobos
RB Scottre Humphrey 174 rush yds · 3 TD #64 RB
TE Cade Keith 5 rec · 91 yds · 1 TD #46 TE
DL Brett Karhu 4 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 2.5 TFL #260 DL
K Grant Glasgow 3 FG · 10 XP · 19 pts #43 K

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
UTEP MinersCUSA -2.1 +0.4 -2.5 #199
New Mexico LobosMWC +12.1 +9.1 +3.0 #73

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
UTEP offense vs New Mexico defense-2.5 pts
New Mexico offense vs UTEP defense+11.6 pts
Altitude · context only371 m higher than the visitor's home elevation

An efficiency adjustment from season-to-date EPA and success rate applies once teams have played enough games; before then it is 0 and the number is the power rating alone.

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.