Our side
MoneylineCAM to win
ours 90%
Projected score
17–40
NCAT – CAM
2026-09-19 · 6:00 PM
Barker-Lane Stadium · Buies Creek, NC
Conference game
Early season
The books
No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.
Series
Campbell and North Carolina A&T split 4 (2–2)
· 4 meetings since 2022
2025 unit ranks —
last completed season, from games actually played
Run game
even
8 ranks apart
North Carolina A&T Aggies #217 rush offense
Campbell Fighting Camels #225 run defense
Pass game
edge North Carolina A&T Aggies
53 ranks
North Carolina A&T Aggies #169 pass offense
Campbell Fighting Camels #222 pass defense
Run game
even
42 ranks apart
Campbell Fighting Camels #197 rush offense
North Carolina A&T Aggies #239 run defense
Pass game
edge Campbell Fighting Camels
78 ranks
Campbell Fighting Camels #173 pass offense
North Carolina A&T Aggies #251 pass defense
North Carolina A&T Aggies
Balanced · 57% run
Ball-control
Campbell Fighting Camels
Balanced · 51% run
Avg pace
Ranked by team-unit strength
(rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265
D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the
2025 season.
The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above
Who carried each team in 2025
North Carolina A&T Aggies
TE
Anthony Rucker
7 rec · 115 yds · 2 TD
#29 TE
DB
Mykell Harvey
16 tkl · 2 PD
#183 DB
WR
Elijah Kennedy
13 rec · 152 yds · 2 TD
#148 WR
DL
Eddie Conover
8 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#336 DL
Campbell Fighting Camels
DL
Justin Garza
7 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL
#124 DL
DL
Ebenezer Bedada
8 tkl · 1.5 TFL
#197 DL
WR
Spencer Jones
15 rec · 203 yds · 1 TD
#136 WR
LB
AJ Benton
16 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL
#135 LB
Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their
position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no
2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for
these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.
Power breakdown
Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).
Where the number comes from
North Carolina A&T offense vs Campbell defense-8.5 pts
Campbell offense vs North Carolina A&T defense+10.7 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness+0.3 pts
Power projection before adjustment+22.6
The projection carries an efficiency adjustment —
a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by
walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).