← Matchups

Mercyhurst

· 0-3 · power -16.3 · #357
Our numberSTO -5.3 no book has priced this game

Stonehill

· 1-2 (1-0) · power -17.0 · #360
Our side
MoneylineSTO to win ours 63%
Projected score 22–27 MERC – STO
2026-10-31 · 12:00 PM W.B. Mason Stadium · North Easton, MA Conference game Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

Series Stonehill lead 1–0 · 1 meeting since 2025
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game even 27 ranks apart
Mercyhurst Lakers #220 rush offense Stonehill Skyhawks #193 run defense
Pass game edge Stonehill Skyhawks 169 ranks
Mercyhurst Lakers #190 pass offense Stonehill Skyhawks #21 pass defense
Run game even 37 ranks apart
Stonehill Skyhawks #249 rush offense Mercyhurst Lakers #212 run defense
Pass game edge Mercyhurst Lakers 59 ranks
Stonehill Skyhawks #202 pass offense Mercyhurst Lakers #143 pass defense
Mercyhurst Lakers Balanced · 47% run Ball-control Stonehill Skyhawks Run-heavy · 59% run Ball-control

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Mercyhurst Lakers
DL Zacchaeus Dixon 15 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL #135 DL
DB Braylon Beckwith 21 tkl #182 DB
TE Camden Lewis 10 rec · 83 yds · 1 TD #44 TE
P Thomas O'Neill 19 punts · 43.3 yd avg #24 P
Stonehill Skyhawks
TE Cole Clarke 11 rec · 169 yds · 1 TD #26 TE
DL Christopher Gill 12 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL #261 DL
LB Caden Henritzy 21 tkl · 1.0 TFL #163 LB
DB Mo Seide 13 tkl · 1 PD · 1 INT #267 DB

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Mercyhurst Lakers -16.3 -8.4 -7.9 #357
Stonehill Skyhawks -17.0 -14.7 -2.2 #360

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Mercyhurst offense vs Stonehill defense-6.2 pts
Stonehill offense vs Mercyhurst defense-6.8 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness+3.0 pts
Power projection before adjustment+2.3
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 460 mi

The projection carries an efficiency adjustment — a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.