← Matchups

Utah Tech

· 0-3 · power -10.2 · #297
Our numberWEB -8.0 no book has priced this game

Weber State

· 1-2 (1-0) · power -6.5 · #256
Our side
MoneylineWEB to win ours 69%
Projected score 27–35 UTU – WEB
2026-11-21 · 3:00 PM Stewart Stadium · Ogden, UT Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

Series Weber State lead 3–0 · 3 meetings since 2008
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Run game edge Utah Tech Trailblazers 73 ranks
Utah Tech Trailblazers #174 rush offense Weber State Wildcats #247 run defense
Pass game edge Weber State Wildcats 93 ranks
Utah Tech Trailblazers #230 pass offense Weber State Wildcats #137 pass defense
Run game edge Weber State Wildcats 49 ranks
Weber State Wildcats #165 rush offense Utah Tech Trailblazers #214 run defense
Pass game edge Utah Tech Trailblazers 95 ranks
Weber State Wildcats #249 pass offense Utah Tech Trailblazers #154 pass defense
Utah Tech Trailblazers Balanced · 55% run Avg pace Weber State Wildcats Balanced · 58% run Ball-control

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Utah Tech Trailblazers
DB Jeremiah Jimoh 19 tkl · 3 PD #40 DB
DB Quincy Lejay 22 tkl · 1 PD #45 DB
P Ryan Marks 17 punts · 46.3 yd avg #7 P
DB Brevin Czosnyka 17 tkl #314 DB
Weber State Wildcats
WR Noah Kjar 22 rec · 385 yds · 6 TD #2 WR
LB Teni Worthen 25 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL #52 LB
LB Zach Smith 10 tkl #59 LB
P Henry Way 13 punts · 45.4 yd avg #13 P

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Utah Tech Trailblazers -10.2 -6.6 -3.6 #297
Weber State Wildcats -6.5 +3.4 -9.9 #256

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Utah Tech offense vs Weber State defense+3.3 pts
Weber State offense vs Utah Tech defense+7.1 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness+1.3 pts
Power projection before adjustment+6.7
Altitude · context only594 m higher than the visitor's home elevation

The projection carries an efficiency adjustment — a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.