Our side
MoneylinePV to win
ours 75%
Projected score
24–35
AAMU – PV
2026-11-07 · 3:00 PM
Panther Stadium · Prairie View, TX
Conference game
Early season
The books
No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.
Series
Prairie View A&M lead
9–2
· 11 meetings since 2007
2025 unit ranks —
last completed season, from games actually played
Run game
edge Prairie View A&M Panthers
177 ranks
Alabama A&M Bulldogs #219 rush offense
Prairie View A&M Panthers #42 run defense
Pass game
edge Prairie View A&M Panthers
157 ranks
Alabama A&M Bulldogs #176 pass offense
Prairie View A&M Panthers #19 pass defense
Run game
edge Prairie View A&M Panthers
72 ranks
Prairie View A&M Panthers #58 rush offense
Alabama A&M Bulldogs #130 run defense
Pass game
edge Prairie View A&M Panthers
208 ranks
Prairie View A&M Panthers #53 pass offense
Alabama A&M Bulldogs #261 pass defense
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
Balanced · 48% run
Ball-control
Prairie View A&M Panthers
Balanced · 53% run
Ball-control
Dual-threat QB · 42 rush ypg
Ranked by team-unit strength
(rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265
D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the
2025 season.
The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above
Who carried each team in 2025
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
DB
Jeremiah Hudson-Davis
35 tkl · 2 PD · 1 INT
#10 DB
DL
Kylon Roberts
17 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#54 DL
WR
Jarel Williams
16 rec · 279 yds · 2 TD
#47 WR
DL
Arenza Davis
12 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.5 TFL
#113 DL
Prairie View A&M Panthers
DB
Kamrin Canterbury
27 tkl · 2 PD
#36 DB
DB
Malachi Williams
11 tkl · 1 INT
#102 DB
DB
Nahamani Harris
21 tkl · 2 PD
#123 DB
DL
Malik Gucake
9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL
#154 DL
Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their
position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no
2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for
these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.
Power breakdown
Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).
Where the number comes from
Alabama A&M offense vs Prairie View A&M defense-2.4 pts
Prairie View A&M offense vs Alabama A&M defense+8.3 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness-2.7 pts
Power projection before adjustment+13.8
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 637 mi
Rest · context onlyHome team on 7 more days rest
The projection carries an efficiency adjustment —
a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by
walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).
Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest
were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them.
Adding them again would double-count.