Our side
MoneylineFUR to win
ours 65%
Projected score
18–25
WOF – FUR
2026-10-03 · 2:00 PM
Paladin Stadium · Greenville, SC
Conference game
Early season
The books
No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.
Series
Furman lead
40–30–5
· 75 meetings since 1914
2025 unit ranks —
last completed season, from games actually played
Run game
edge Furman Paladins
65 ranks
Wofford Terriers #230 rush offense
Furman Paladins #165 run defense
Pass game
edge Furman Paladins
58 ranks
Wofford Terriers #214 pass offense
Furman Paladins #156 pass defense
Run game
edge Wofford Terriers
207 ranks
Furman Paladins #214 rush offense
Wofford Terriers #7 run defense
Pass game
edge Wofford Terriers
69 ranks
Furman Paladins #165 pass offense
Wofford Terriers #96 pass defense
Wofford Terriers
Balanced · 51% run
Ball-control
Furman Paladins
Balanced · 47% run
Ball-control
Ranked by team-unit strength
(rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all 265
D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the
2025 season.
The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above
Who carried each team in 2025
Wofford Terriers
LB
Wyatt Ward
28 tkl · 2.5 TFL
#16 LB
RB
Gerald Modest Jr.
246 rush yds · 4 TD · 6 rec
#26 RB
DB
Cole Walker
14 tkl · 5 PD
#75 DB
LB
Javario Tinch
17 tkl · 1.5 TFL
#86 LB
Furman Paladins
DB
Eli Lipscomb
12 tkl
#127 DB
DB
Caleb Easterling
8 tkl · 1 PD · 2 INT
#144 DB
WR
Daniel Haughton
12 rec · 116 yds · 1 TD
#140 WR
DL
Joshua Stoneking
10 tkl · 2.0 TFL
#265 DL
Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their
position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no
2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for
these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.
Power breakdown
Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).
Where the number comes from
Wofford offense vs Furman defense-14.9 pts
Furman offense vs Wofford defense-10.3 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness-1.2 pts
Power projection before adjustment+7.5
The projection carries an efficiency adjustment —
a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by
walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).