← Matchups

Chicago State

· 1-2 · power -12.5 · #323
Our numberSUU -12.1 no book has priced this game

Southern Utah

· 1-2 · power -2.6 · #211
Our side
MoneylineSUU to win ours 77%
Projected score 26–38 CHIC – SUU
2026-11-21 · 2:00 PM Eccles Coliseum · Cedar City, UT Early season

The books

No book has priced this game. Nothing to compare, and no ticket to build.

First recorded meeting between these programs
2025 unit ranks — last completed season, from games actually played
Southern Utah Thunderbirds Run-heavy · 59% run Avg pace

Ranked by team-unit strength (rush & pass offense vs. run & pass defense) across all D1 D1 teams, not by individual players. Identity, tempo and unit strength are measured from the 2025 season.

The evidence 2025 production and power ratings · supporting the number above

Who carried each team in 2025
Chicago State Cougars
DL Jayden Earley 12 tkl · 1.5 TFL #6 DL
DL Lesroy Tittle 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL #7 DL
DL Tehron Spencer 14 tkl · 2.0 TFL #38 DL
DL Armani Itote 11 tkl · 2.0 TFL #108 DL
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
DB Parker Vance 18 tkl · 4 PD · 3 INT #4 DB
TE Joshua Acord 11 rec · 128 yds · 3 TD #3 TE
RB Floyd Chalk 427 rush yds · 6 TD · 4 rec #6 RB
DL Myles Amey 9 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 3.5 TFL #103 DL

Top-rated players from last season, ranked within their position across D1. A grade measures what a player produced, and no 2026 game has been played yet — so this is who produced for these programs in 2025, not a claim about who is on the field this year.

Power breakdown
TeamPowerOffDefRank
Chicago State Cougars -12.5 -4.2 -8.3 #323
Southern Utah Thunderbirds -2.6 +4.0 -6.5 #211

Def is higher = better. The projection assumes a 2.4-pt home edge (0 at neutral sites).

Where the number comes from
Chicago State offense vs Southern Utah defense+2.4 pts
Southern Utah offense vs Chicago State defense+12.3 pts
Efficiency adjustment · EPA, success rate, explosiveness-0.9 pts
Power projection before adjustment+13.0
Travel · context onlyAway team travels 1,367 mi
Altitude · context only1,577 m higher than the visitor's home elevation
Rest · context onlyHome team on 8 more days rest

The projection carries an efficiency adjustment — a residual from season-to-date EPA, success rate and explosiveness, which earned its place by walk-forward test (margin error 12.90 → 12.72 across seven held-out seasons).

Situational spots are shown for context, not baked in: travel, altitude and rest were tested against 6,000+ games and the power and efficiency ratings already account for them. Adding them again would double-count.