Player ratings 2026 season

Pos rankPlayerPos School Grade G2026 season
#1 Mason Lindberg K Idaho State FCS 95 3 7 FG · 15 XP · 36 pts
#4 Tristan Alvano K South Dakota State FCS 86 3 6 FG · 17 XP · 35 pts
#7 Drew Klein K North Dakota State FCS 82 3 6 FG · 13 XP · 31 pts
#9 Carlos Alvarado K Stephen F. Austin FCS 80 3 6 FG · 12 XP · 30 pts
#12 Myles Sansted K Montana State FCS 79 3 5 FG · 14 XP · 29 pts
#13 Max Lipinski K William & Mary FCS 78 3 8 FG · 5 XP · 29 pts
#15 Bohdie Ing K South Dakota FCS 77 3 4 FG · 18 XP · 30 pts
#16 Brysen Gardner K None FCS 77 3 6 FG · 9 XP · 27 pts
#32 Andrew Ivaniciuc K Jackson State FCS 71 2 5 FG · 8 XP · 23 pts
#33 Alejandro De La Poza K Tarleton State FCS 71 3 4 FG · 12 XP · 24 pts
#34 Simon Zeidan K Mercer FCS 71 3 5 FG · 10 XP · 25 pts
#37 David Faulk K Alabama A&M FCS 70 3 5 FG · 11 XP · 26 pts
#46 Justin Keller K Southeast Missouri State FCS 68 3 6 FG · 5 XP · 23 pts
#47 Jett Jackson K South Carolina State FCS 68 3 3 FG · 19 XP · 28 pts
#55 Ty Ippolito K Samford FCS 67 3 6 FG · 3 XP · 21 pts
#57 Owen Forsman K Idaho FCS 66 3 5 FG · 6 XP · 21 pts
#58 Carter Brown K Tennessee Tech FCS 66 3 3 FG · 14 XP · 23 pts
#61 Will Graham K Lindenwood FCS 66 3 5 FG · 7 XP · 22 pts
#63 Ben Hoiland K St. Thomas-Minnesota FCS 65 3 5 FG · 6 XP · 21 pts
#64 Lukasz Smolen K Houston Christian FCS 65 3 4 FG · 15 XP · 27 pts
#66 Jude Kelley K Chattanooga FCS 65 3 5 FG · 5 XP · 20 pts
#68 Ethan Eddins K Prairie View A&M FCS 64 3 4 FG · 9 XP · 21 pts
#69 Bryan McCollum K Western Carolina FCS 64 3 4 FG · 8 XP · 20 pts
#71 Beck Janki K Butler FCS 64 2 2 FG · 10 XP · 16 pts
#74 Tyler Simpson K Gardner-Webb FCS 64 3 5 FG · 3 XP · 18 pts
#87 David Dellenbach K Weber State FCS 62 3 3 FG · 10 XP · 19 pts
#89 David Maurer K Dayton FCS 62 2 3 FG · 8 XP · 17 pts
#90 Caleb Jones K Central Arkansas FCS 62 3 2 FG · 14 XP · 20 pts
#92 Francisco Orduno Jr. K Northern Arizona FCS 61 3 3 FG · 10 XP · 19 pts
#95 Ronan Culkin K Western Illinois FCS 61 2 4 FG · 1 XP · 13 pts
#97 Connor Poole K Lehigh FCS 61 3 1 FG · 17 XP · 20 pts
#99 Dominic LeBlanc K Villanova FCS 60 3 4 FG · 6 XP · 18 pts
#100 Soren McKee K Eastern Washington FCS 60 3 3 FG · 9 XP · 18 pts
#110 Michael Cosentino K Illinois State FCS 59 2 2 FG · 9 XP · 15 pts
#111 Sam Spence K Wofford FCS 59 3 3 FG · 9 XP · 18 pts
#112 Jo Silver K Montana FCS 59 3 1 FG · 15 XP · 18 pts
#113 Deaglan Camron K McNeese FCS 59 3 2 FG · 11 XP · 17 pts
#114 Joshua Hossmann Lees K Portland State FCS 59 3 3 FG · 6 XP · 15 pts
#115 Luke Barnes K Elon FCS 59 3 2 FG · 12 XP · 18 pts
#116 Ty Groff K Rhode Island FCS 58 3 2 FG · 10 XP · 16 pts
#117 Kingston Phan K Nicholls FCS 58 3 3 FG · 8 XP · 17 pts
#124 Grant Meadors K Sacramento State FCS 58 3 3 FG · 8 XP · 17 pts
#126 Kade Bailey K Presbyterian FCS 58 2 3 FG · 5 XP · 14 pts
#127 Sebastian Lopez K Indiana State FCS 57 3 2 FG · 10 XP · 16 pts
#128 Marco Peery K Norfolk State FCS 57 3 2 FG · 9 XP · 15 pts
#129 Jack Hennessey K Central Connecticut FCS 57 2 3 FG · 3 XP · 12 pts
#130 Evan Kiely K The Citadel FCS 57 3 2 FG · 9 XP · 15 pts
#131 Nicholas Stoyanovich K Bryant FCS 57 3 3 FG · 7 XP · 16 pts
#132 Liam Quigley K New Haven FCS 57 3 4 FG · 3 XP · 15 pts
#134 Ewan Johnson K East Tennessee State FCS 57 3 2 FG · 9 XP · 15 pts

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.

Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.