Player ratings 2026 season
| Pos rank | Player | Pos | School | Grade | G | 2026 season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Hunter Tipton | TE |
 Memphis
FBS
|
97 | 3 | 14 rec · 291 yds · 2 TD |
| #2 | Luke Reynolds | TE |
 Virginia Tech
FBS
|
92 | 2 | 13 rec · 158 yds · 3 TD |
| #4 | Benjamin Brahmer | TE |
 Penn State
FBS
|
88 | 2 | 6 rec · 87 yds · 3 TD |
| #5 | Trey'Dez Green | TE |
 LSU
FBS
|
87 | 2 | 10 rec · 162 yds · 1 TD |
| #6 | Kari Ashley | TE |
 TCU
FBS
|
86 | 2 | 10 rec · 136 yds · 2 TD |
| #8 | Noah Bennee | TE |
 Utah
FBS
|
84 | 2 | 5 rec · 148 yds · 2 TD |
| #9 | Elijah Alexander | TE |
 Akron
FBS
|
83 | 2 | 7 rec · 61 yds · 3 TD |
| #10 | Mark Bowman | TE |
 USC
FBS
|
82 | 3 | 12 rec · 128 yds · 2 TD |
| #13 | Rocky Beers | TE |
 Oklahoma
FBS
|
81 | 2 | 8 rec · 137 yds · 1 TD |
| #15 | Jelani Thurman | TE |
 North Carolina
FBS
|
80 | 2 | 8 rec · 165 yds · 1 TD |
| #16 | Willie Rodriguez | TE |
 Kentucky
FBS
|
79 | 2 | 12 rec · 97 yds · 1 TD |
| #17 | Darrin Fugitt | TE |
 App State
FBS
|
79 | 2 | 11 rec · 113 yds · 1 TD |
| #18 | Randy Pittman Jr. | TE |
 SMU
FBS
|
79 | 2 | 6 rec · 77 yds · 2 TD |
| #21 | Daunte Bacheyie | TE |
 Syracuse
FBS
|
78 | 2 | 6 rec · 85 yds · 2 TD |
| #23 | Jaleel Skinner | TE |
 Louisville
FBS
|
77 | 2 | 5 rec · 137 yds · 1 TD |
| #25 | Jeremiah Scoby | TE |
 Bowling Green
FBS
|
76 | 2 | 12 rec · 121 yds |
| #27 | Benji Blackburn | TE |
 Stanford
FBS
|
76 | 2 | 12 rec · 101 yds |
| #28 | Mason Mini | TE |
 California
FBS
|
76 | 2 | 6 rec · 96 yds · 1 TD |
| #30 | Patrick Overmyer | TE |
 Houston
FBS
|
75 | 2 | 8 rec · 100 yds · 1 TD |
| #31 | Jamari Johnson | TE |
 Oregon
FBS
|
75 | 1 | 4 rec · 57 yds · 1 TD |
| #32 | Luke Gilbert | TE |
 Jacksonville State
FBS
|
75 | 3 | 3 rec · 116 yds · 2 TD |
| #34 | Kevin Roche Jr. | TE |
 Georgia Tech
FBS
|
74 | 2 | 10 rec · 103 yds |
| #35 | Theo Melin Ohrstrom | TE |
SMU
FBS
|
74 | 1 | 3 rec · 25 yds · 2 TD |
| #37 | Jayvontay Conner | TE |
 Vanderbilt
FBS
|
74 | 2 | 10 rec · 117 yds |
| #38 | Ethan Davis | TE |
 Tennessee
FBS
|
73 | 2 | 3 rec · 43 yds · 2 TD |
| #39 | Caleb Odom | TE |
 Ole Miss
FBS
|
73 | 1 | 3 rec · 66 yds · 1 TD |
| #42 | Vince Benetti | TE |
 Iowa State
FBS
|
72 | 2 | 3 rec · 34 yds · 2 TD |
| #45 | Matt Wagner | TE |
 Boise State
FBS
|
72 | 2 | 6 rec · 49 yds · 1 TD |
| #46 | Cade Keith | TE |
 New Mexico
FBS
|
72 | 2 | 5 rec · 91 yds · 1 TD |
| #47 | Jayden Savoury | TE |
 Michigan State
FBS
|
72 | 2 | 8 rec · 99 yds |
| #49 | Toby Payne | TE |
 Marshall
FBS
|
71 | 2 | 9 rec · 61 yds |
| #50 | Mikkel Skinner | TE |
Kentucky
FBS
|
71 | 1 | 4 rec · 61 yds · 1 TD |
| #52 | Preston Douglas | TE |
 NC State
FBS
|
71 | 2 | 5 rec · 71 yds · 1 TD |
| #54 | Zack Turner | TE |
SMU
FBS
|
70 | 1 | 3 rec · 53 yds · 1 TD |
| #55 | Cash Cheeks | TE |
 UTEP
FBS
|
70 | 2 | 3 rec · 51 yds · 2 TD |
| #58 | James Resar | TE |
 Florida International
FBS
|
70 | 1 | 3 rec · 31 yds · 1 TD |
| #59 | Caden Jensen | TE |
 Louisiana
FBS
|
70 | 1 | 5 rec · 77 yds |
| #60 | Baron Naone | TE |
 Washington
FBS
|
70 | 2 | 8 rec · 70 yds |
| #61 | Ka'Morreun Pimpton | TE |
TCU
FBS
|
69 | 2 | 3 rec · 77 yds · 1 TD |
| #62 | Joshua Long | TE |
 Eastern Michigan
FBS
|
69 | 3 | 12 rec · 82 yds |
| #64 | Jordan Collins | TE |
 Navy
FBS
|
69 | 1 | 2 rec · 68 yds · 1 TD |
| #67 | Jeremiah Hasley | TE |
 Duke
FBS
|
69 | 2 | 5 rec · 89 yds |
| #68 | Elijah Lagg | TE |
 Pittsburgh
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 5 rec · 40 yds · 1 TD |
| #69 | Eli Finley | TE |
 Louisiana Tech
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 6 rec · 67 yds · 1 TD |
| #70 | Tate Hoover | TE |
 Ball State
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 6 rec · 23 yds · 1 TD |
| #72 | Brandon Young Jr. | TE |
 UTSA
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 2 rec · 8 yds · 2 TD |
| #73 | Charlie Williams | TE |
 Colorado
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 3 rec · 51 yds · 1 TD |
| #74 | Henry Boyer | TE |
Kentucky
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 2 rec · 51 yds · 1 TD |
| #75 | River Helms | TE |
 Georgia Southern
FBS
|
68 | 2 | 8 rec · 53 yds |
| #76 | Shane King | TE |
 Arizona
FBS
|
68 | 1 | 2 rec · 21 yds · 1 TD |
What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.
What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.
Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.