Player ratings 2026 season
| Pos rank | Player | Pos | School | Grade | G | 2026 season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Xavier Lewis | DL |
|
99 | 2 | 12 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 6.5 TFL |
| #2 | Khalid Bueno | DL |
|
99 | 3 | 21 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL |
| #3 | Jordan Ross | DL |
|
98 | 2 | 7 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #4 | Princewill Umanmielen | DL |
|
96 | 2 | 11 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 6.0 TFL |
| #5 | Mi'Quise Humphrey-Grace | DL |
|
95 | 2 | 6 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL |
| #6 | Jayden Earley | DL | —— | 94 | 3 | 12 tkl · 1.5 TFL |
| #7 | Lesroy Tittle | DL | —— | 93 | 1 | 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #8 | Elijah Kinsler | DL |
|
93 | 3 | 18 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #9 | Thomas Davis | DL |
|
92 | 2 | 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #10 | Marco Jones | DL |
|
92 | 2 | 5 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL |
| #11 | Jimmy Mulholland | DL | —— | 91 | 1 | 9 tkl |
| #12 | Zarion Walters | DL |
|
90 | 3 | 17 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 6.0 TFL |
| #13 | Tawfiq Thomas | DL |
|
90 | 2 | 14 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #14 | Trehsyn Fesili | DL |
|
90 | 3 | 20 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #15 | Ibrahim Sanogo | DL |
|
89 | 2 | 11 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
| #16 | Dylan LaBarbera | DL |
|
89 | 2 | 15 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL |
| #17 | Dom Nichols | DL |
|
89 | 2 | 10 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #18 | Quincy Byas | DL |
|
88 | 3 | 12 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #19 | Lamont Lester Jr. | DL |
|
88 | 2 | 7 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL |
| #20 | Avery Howard | DL |
|
88 | 3 | 17 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL |
| #21 | Eli Coenen | DL |
|
88 | 2 | 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #22 | Keno Jones | DL |
|
87 | 2 | 13 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #23 | Miles Capers | DL |
|
87 | 2 | 9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #24 | Chris Bacon | DL |
|
87 | 3 | 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #25 | Esaia Bogar | DL |
|
87 | 2 | 12 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.5 TFL |
| #26 | Elisha Baldridge | DL |
|
86 | 2 | 11 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #27 | Jeramiah McCloud | DL |
|
86 | 2 | 12 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 0.5 TFL |
| #28 | Jeremiah Young | DL |
|
86 | 2 | 7 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #29 | Cayden Adkins | DL |
|
86 | 3 | 11 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #30 | Asher Wilson | DL |
|
86 | 3 | 14 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #31 | Jermari Seals | DL | —— | 85 | 1 | 13 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 1.5 TFL |
| #32 | Camden Byrd | DL |
|
85 | 3 | 7 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #33 | Tavion Gadson | DL |
|
85 | 1 | 5 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #34 | Ike Ackerman | DL |
|
85 | 2 | 13 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL |
| #35 | Dylan McCarthy | DL | —— | 85 | 1 | 3 tkl |
| #36 | Xavier Gilliam | DL |
|
84 | 2 | 8 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
| #37 | Nathaniel McDonald | DL |
|
84 | 3 | 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #38 | Tehron Spencer | DL | —— | 84 | 2 | 14 tkl · 2.0 TFL |
| #39 | Mylachi Williams | DL |
|
84 | 2 | 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 6.0 TFL |
| #40 | Ben Voigtlaender | DL |
|
84 | 3 | 14 tkl · 2.5 TFL |
| #41 | Tae Floyd | DL |
|
84 | 3 | 12 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL |
| #42 | Will Heldt | DL |
|
84 | 2 | 7 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #43 | Keron Pryor | DL | —— | 84 | 1 | 3 tkl |
| #44 | Collin Lewis | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 0.5 TFL |
| #45 | John Henry Daley | DL |
|
83 | 2 | 11 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL |
| #46 | Hudson Tucker | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL |
| #47 | A'Khoury Lyde | DL | —— | 83 | 1 | 1 tkl |
| #48 | Shawan Lewis | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 10 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL |
| #49 | Leroy Harris III | DL |
|
83 | 2 | 8 tkl · 4.0 TFL |
| #50 | Jordan Dollard | DL |
|
83 | 3 | 11 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL |
What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.
What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.
Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.