Player ratings 2026 season

Pos rankPlayerPos School Grade G2026 season
#1 Xavier Lewis DL North Carolina FBS 99 2 12 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 6.5 TFL
#2 Khalid Bueno DL Stony Brook FCS 99 3 21 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 8.5 TFL
#3 Jordan Ross DL LSU FBS 98 2 7 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#4 Princewill Umanmielen DL LSU FBS 96 2 11 tkl · 4.5 sacks · 6.0 TFL
#5 Mi'Quise Humphrey-Grace DL Kentucky FBS 95 2 6 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL
#6 Jayden Earley DL 94 3 12 tkl · 1.5 TFL
#7 Lesroy Tittle DL 93 1 4 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#8 Elijah Kinsler DL Memphis FBS 93 3 18 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#9 Thomas Davis DL Tulsa FBS 92 2 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#10 Marco Jones DL Texas A&M FBS 92 2 5 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.0 TFL
#11 Jimmy Mulholland DL 91 1 9 tkl
#12 Zarion Walters DL North Carolina Central FCS 90 3 17 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 6.0 TFL
#13 Tawfiq Thomas DL Georgia Tech FBS 90 2 14 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#14 Trehsyn Fesili DL Idaho State FCS 90 3 20 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#15 Ibrahim Sanogo DL Southern Illinois FCS 89 2 11 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL
#16 Dylan LaBarbera DL Nevada FBS 89 2 15 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 1.5 TFL
#17 Dom Nichols DL Michigan FBS 89 2 10 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#18 Quincy Byas DL Eastern Michigan FBS 88 3 12 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#19 Lamont Lester Jr. DL Colorado FBS 88 2 7 tkl · 4.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL
#20 Avery Howard DL North Alabama FCS 88 3 17 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL
#21 Eli Coenen DL Michigan State FBS 88 2 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#22 Keno Jones DL Troy FBS 87 2 13 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#23 Miles Capers DL Vanderbilt FBS 87 2 9 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#24 Chris Bacon DL Maine FCS 87 3 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#25 Esaia Bogar DL Wyoming FBS 87 2 12 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 2.5 TFL
#26 Elisha Baldridge DL Florida International FBS 86 2 11 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#27 Jeramiah McCloud DL Florida FBS 86 2 12 tkl · 0.5 sacks · 0.5 TFL
#28 Jeremiah Young DL Incarnate Word FCS 86 2 7 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#29 Cayden Adkins DL North Alabama FCS 86 3 11 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#30 Asher Wilson DL Robert Morris FCS 86 3 14 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#31 Jermari Seals DL 85 1 13 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 1.5 TFL
#32 Camden Byrd DL Richmond FCS 85 3 7 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#33 Tavion Gadson DL Kentucky FBS 85 1 5 tkl · 1.5 sacks · 2.0 TFL
#34 Ike Ackerman DL Ohio FBS 85 2 13 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 2.0 TFL
#35 Dylan McCarthy DL 85 1 3 tkl
#36 Xavier Gilliam DL Tennessee FBS 84 2 8 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 5.5 TFL
#37 Nathaniel McDonald DL William & Mary FCS 84 3 8 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#38 Tehron Spencer DL 84 2 14 tkl · 2.0 TFL
#39 Mylachi Williams DL Virginia Tech FBS 84 2 7 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 6.0 TFL
#40 Ben Voigtlaender DL Eastern Washington FCS 84 3 14 tkl · 2.5 TFL
#41 Tae Floyd DL Jacksonville State FBS 84 3 12 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 5.0 TFL
#42 Will Heldt DL Clemson FBS 84 2 7 tkl · 2.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#43 Keron Pryor DL 84 1 3 tkl
#44 Collin Lewis DL Idaho State FCS 83 3 10 tkl · 0.5 TFL
#45 John Henry Daley DL Michigan FBS 83 2 11 tkl · 1.0 sacks · 3.0 TFL
#46 Hudson Tucker DL Tennessee Tech FCS 83 3 10 tkl · 3.0 sacks · 4.0 TFL
#47 A'Khoury Lyde DL 83 1 1 tkl
#48 Shawan Lewis DL UAlbany FCS 83 3 10 tkl · 3.5 sacks · 4.5 TFL
#49 Leroy Harris III DL Kansas FBS 83 2 8 tkl · 4.0 TFL
#50 Jordan Dollard DL South Carolina State FCS 83 3 11 tkl · 2.5 sacks · 5.5 TFL

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.

Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.