BallKnowMe college football, by the numbers

Player ratings 2026 season

All positions QB RB WR TE DL LB DB K P All D1 FBS FCS
Pos rankPlayerPos School Grade G2026 season
#1 KJ Duff WR Rutgers FBS 99 2 17 rec · 333 yds · 5 TD
#3 Jesse Legree WR Oregon State FBS 95 2 13 rec · 376 yds · 3 TD
#4 Reed Harris WR Arizona State FBS 94 2 15 rec · 326 yds · 4 TD
#5 Collin Dixon WR Illinois FBS 92 2 17 rec · 236 yds · 5 TD
#6 Chance Morrow WR Buffalo FBS 92 2 18 rec · 221 yds · 5 TD
#7 Jeremiah Smith WR Ohio State FBS 91 2 16 rec · 315 yds · 3 TD
#8 Malachi Toney WR Miami FBS 90 2 16 rec · 330 yds · 4 TD
#9 Gavin Freeman WR Baylor FBS 89 2 22 rec · 258 yds · 1 TD
#12 Easton Messer WR Florida Atlantic FBS 88 2 15 rec · 252 yds · 2 TD
#13 Trent Mosley WR USC FBS 87 3 13 rec · 255 yds · 4 TD
#15 Kelby Valsin WR Florida Atlantic FBS 86 2 18 rec · 207 yds · 2 TD
#20 Anthony Evans III WR Mississippi State FBS 85 2 14 rec · 239 yds · 2 TD
#21 Charlie Becker WR Indiana FBS 85 2 7 rec · 145 yds · 5 TD
#24 Deuce Alexander WR Ole Miss FBS 84 2 13 rec · 235 yds · 2 TD
#25 Brendan Jenkins WR South Alabama FBS 84 2 14 rec · 197 yds · 2 TD
#26 Ashton Hollins WR Georgia Southern FBS 83 2 13 rec · 203 yds · 2 TD
#28 Donovan Olugbode WR Missouri FBS 83 2 14 rec · 237 yds · 3 TD
#33 Jamill Williams WR Jacksonville State FBS 82 3 14 rec · 188 yds · 4 TD
#34 Maguire Anderson WR Florida International FBS 82 2 13 rec · 186 yds · 2 TD
#35 Jacory Barney Jr. WR Nebraska FBS 82 2 13 rec · 175 yds · 2 TD
#37 Cam'ron Lacy WR Middle Tennessee FBS 81 2 17 rec · 190 yds · 2 TD
#38 Umari Hatcher WR Syracuse FBS 81 2 14 rec · 224 yds · 2 TD
#39 Tony Diaz WR Iowa FBS 81 2 15 rec · 179 yds · 1 TD
#40 Cooper Hoch WR San José State FBS 81 3 14 rec · 216 yds · 3 TD
#41 Jalen Mickens WR Louisiana Tech FBS 80 2 9 rec · 234 yds · 2 TD
#43 Carson Clark WR San José State FBS 80 3 19 rec · 213 yds · 2 TD
#44 Wyatt Young WR Oklahoma State FBS 80 2 13 rec · 205 yds · 1 TD
#48 TK King WR New Mexico State FBS 80 3 14 rec · 239 yds · 2 TD
#49 Carlos Hernandez WR Wake Forest FBS 79 2 11 rec · 253 yds · 1 TD
#51 Josh Manning WR Kansas State FBS 79 2 13 rec · 130 yds · 2 TD
#55 Eli Wood WR Utah State FBS 79 2 12 rec · 143 yds · 2 TD
#57 Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding WR Maryland FBS 78 2 14 rec · 187 yds · 2 TD
#59 Adjatay Dabbs WR Toledo FBS 78 2 8 rec · 135 yds · 3 TD
#60 Kwazi Gilmer WR Nebraska FBS 78 2 11 rec · 97 yds · 3 TD
#64 Ryan Wingo WR Texas FBS 78 2 11 rec · 143 yds · 2 TD
#65 RJ Vick WR Colorado State FBS 78 2 9 rec · 108 yds · 3 TD
#68 Dakorien Moore WR Oregon FBS 77 2 9 rec · 138 yds · 2 TD
#69 Tre Richardson WR Louisville FBS 77 2 11 rec · 181 yds · 1 TD
#71 Koby Howard WR Penn State FBS 77 2 9 rec · 229 yds · 1 TD
#72 Nik McMillan WR Kansas FBS 77 2 8 rec · 182 yds · 2 TD
#73 Amare Thomas WR Houston FBS 77 2 11 rec · 162 yds · 2 TD
#74 Riley Neer WR Ohio FBS 77 2 10 rec · 142 yds · 2 TD
#75 Kayden Dixon-Wyatt WR USC FBS 76 3 13 rec · 181 yds · 2 TD
#78 Cayden Lee WR Missouri FBS 76 2 10 rec · 200 yds · 2 TD
#79 Jordan Faison WR Notre Dame FBS 76 2 8 rec · 135 yds · 2 TD
#80 Winston Watkins Jr. WR LSU FBS 76 2 12 rec · 153 yds · 1 TD
#81 JJ Buchanan WR Michigan FBS 76 2 8 rec · 174 yds · 1 TD
#82 Isaiah Horton WR Texas A&M FBS 76 2 7 rec · 109 yds · 3 TD
#85 Da'Wain Lofton WR Delaware FBS 76 2 7 rec · 206 yds · 1 TD
#86 Omarion Miller WR Arizona State FBS 76 2 17 rec · 131 yds · 1 TD

What this grade is. Box-score production, adjusted for who it came against, shrunk toward the positional average when a player has few games, then ranked within position — so 50 is average for that spot and 85+ is elite. A 90 quarterback and a 90 corner are each elite for their position; the numbers aren’t comparable across positions in any other way.

What it isn’t. It has no charting or play-by-play grading behind it, so it rewards production rather than technique — a back on a run-heavy team gets more chances to produce than an equally good back who touches it half as often. Kickers and punters are graded on volume-light stats and are the least reliable.

Why there is no offensive line. College football publishes no individual OL box stats anywhere, so the only OL number we could build is the team’s offensive rating stamped on a lineman — and a lineman only reaches the ratings at all by recording a stray stat, like falling on a fumble. In 2026 that came to 134 linemen across 106 of 289 teams — so 63% of teams would have none, and the rest one or two of five starters, picked by accident. Ranking that would rank offenses with a lineman’s name attached, so we don’t publish it as a position. A team’s own page still shows those rows, flagged, where the claim is only about that team.